East Carolina
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,453  Corey Hampshire JR 34:25
1,679  Austin Miller SO 34:44
1,713  Jakub Trzasalski JR 34:48
2,267  Antonio Palmer SR 35:39
2,432  Tevin Richardson SO 36:00
2,502  William Cline SO 36:10
2,557  John Young FR 36:18
2,737  Dylan Traywick FR 36:53
2,906  Adam Morrow SO 37:39
National Rank #228 of 311
Southeast Region Rank #32 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 33rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Corey Hampshire Austin Miller Jakub Trzasalski Antonio Palmer Tevin Richardson William Cline John Young Dylan Traywick Adam Morrow
Charlotte Invitational (Green) 09/28 36:52 37:39
Charlotte Invitational (Gold) 09/28 1292 35:42 34:11 34:42 35:53 35:16 36:19
Pre-Nationals Meet (Black) 10/13 1297 34:23 35:09 34:17 35:55 36:34 36:10
Conference USA Championships 10/29 1291 33:56 34:45 35:43 35:23 35:43 37:15
Southeast Region Championships 11/09 34:20





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 32.8 954 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.9 10.8 15.8



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Corey Hampshire 151.3
Austin Miller 168.5
Jakub Trzasalski 172.8
Antonio Palmer 219.4
Tevin Richardson 236.2
William Cline 242.2
John Young 247.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 0.0% 0.0 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 0.4% 0.4 28
29 1.9% 1.9 29
30 10.8% 10.8 30
31 15.8% 15.8 31
32 17.0% 17.0 32
33 17.3% 17.3 33
34 15.7% 15.7 34
35 10.7% 10.7 35
36 6.0% 6.0 36
37 3.0% 3.0 37
38 1.2% 1.2 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0